Home > Maharashtra > Degree > Hingoli > Shri Shivaji SP Mahavidyalaya
Shri Shivaji SP Mahavidyalaya, Hingoli, Maharashtra
Shri Shivaji SP Mahavidyalaya, Hingoli, Maharashtra
Hingoli (District Hingoli)
Shri Shivaji SP Mahavidyalaya, Hingoli Maharashtra is a recognised institute / college.
Shri Shivaji SP Mahavidyalaya is situated in Hingoli of Maharashtra state (Province) in India. This data has been provided by www.punjabcolleges.com. Hingoli comes under Hingoli Tehsil, Hingoli District.
Contact Details of Shri Shivaji SP Mahavidyalaya, Hingoli Maharashtra are : 02456-222015
CoursesShri Shivaji SP Mahavidyalaya, Hingoli Maharashtra runs course(s) in Degree stream(s).
Approval details: Shri Shivaji SP Mahavidyalaya is affiliated with Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University SRTMUN, Nanded (Maharashtra)
Media coverage of Shri Shivaji SP Mahavidyalaya, Hingoli Maharashtra, Maharashtra
NCTE appeal order for Shri Shivaji SP Mahavidyalaya HingoliF.No.89 - 80-2010 - Appeal
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION
Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110002
O R D E R
WHEREAS the appeal of Shri Shivaji Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Hingoli, Maharashtra dated 19-01-2010 is against the Order No. No.WRC-APW05326-1221436-112th-2008-48994 dated 25-12-2008 of the Western Regional Committee, refusing recognition for conducting D.Ed (M) (Co. Ed.) course on the grounds “ The institution has not removed the deficiencies within the period of 90 days u-s 7.4 of NCTE regulations 2005.“
AND WHEREAS the Correspondent, Shri Shivaji Shikshan Prasarak Mandal (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), preferred an appeal dated 04-02-2010 to the National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Council) under Section 18 of the NCTE Act, 1993 against the said Order.
AND WHEREAS Sh.Vasant Pawar, Secretary and Sh. Wankhede. S., Member, Shri Shivaji Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Hingoli, Maharashtra presented the case of the appellant institution on 21-10-2010. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted that appellant preferred an appeal against the refusal order dt. 25- 12-2008 of WRC and the Council vide their letter dt. 25-05-10 informed the appellant that the appeal had not been admitted as it was not preferred within stipulating period of 60 day. Aggrieved by the decision of the Council, the appellant filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Bombay bench at Aurangabad and the Court vide their judgment dt. 21-07-2010 quashed and set aside the Council’s letter-order dt.25-05-10 and remitted the matter back to the appellate authority for a decision afresh by granting an opportunity to the petitioner for filing an application explaining the reason for delay in submission of the appeal.
Since this writ petition has been pending in this court, the court restricted the explanation of the petitioner to the delay which had arisen for one year 04 months and 11 days only.
AND WHEREAS in pursuance to the Court directions the appellant submitted an appeal seeking condonation of delay, on 28-09-10 mentioning the reason for condonation of delay that : 1) the WRC refused recognition vide order dt. 16-25 Dec’2008 on account of non-removal of deficiency as conveyed by their letter dt. 03-02-2007. The appellant was under bonafide belief that, the proposal submitted by the applicant for grant of recognition for the D.Ed. programme was a complete one; the appellant is located in a remote place of Maharashtra and was not able to persuade further so as to comply with the deficiency letter dt. 03-02-07. 2)The institution possessed all the necessary infrastructure so as to start the D.Ed college and would also fulfill all necessary requirements contemplated under laws, if an opportunity would be given. 3) If the delay is not condoned, the appellant would suffer an irreparable loss. 4) The delay caused was unintentional and undeliberate.
AND WHEREAS in compliance with the Court directions the case was listed for hearing on 21-10-2010. the Council perused the reasons submitted earlier and in pursuance to the Court directions and noted that the appeal dt. 19-01-2010 of the appellant preferred against the refusal order dated 25-12-08, was late by 01 year 04 months 11 days. The appellant submitted reasons for condonation of delay vide his letter dt. 12-04-2010 stating that “appellant being secretary of the institution and in the regular course of working the letter was not brought to the notice of the present appellant by his subordinate staff. At the same time appellant was otherwise busy due to the illness of his mother, who ultimately died and due to all these reasons, appellant could not be able to file an appeal”, The Council examined the reasons and found them as unjustifiable for condoning such an in-ordinate delay.
Accordingly decision of the Council for not admitting the appeal on account of delay was communicated to the appellant vide letter dt. 25-05-2010. The reasons now submitted for condonation of delay, subsequent to the Court directions vide appellant’s appeal - application dt. 27-09-10 received in the NCTE office on 28-9- 2010 were altogether different.
The appellant now stated that he has been located in a remote area and the delay was not deliberate and intentional, and if the delay was not condoned it would suffer irreparable loss.
Further he has also admitted that he did not persuade the matter to submit reply to the deficiency letter, thinking that he had filed the application complete in all respects, and in the circumstances when the appellant did not file any reply to the deficiency letter, WRC was justified in refusing recognition. In view of the above the Council came to the conclusion that there was no justification in accepting the appeal for condonation of delay.
AND WHEREAS after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, court order and after considering oral arguments advanced during hearing, the Council reached the conclusion that there was no justification in accepting the appeal for condonation of delay and hence the council reconfirms its earlier decision for not admitting the appeal.
NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby re-confirms its earlier decision dated 25-05-2010 for not admitting the appeal.
1. The Secretary, Shri Shivaji Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Kothalaj Road, District, Hingoli -, Maharashtra
2. The Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of School Education and Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.
3. Regional Director, Western Regional Committee, Manas Bhawan, Shayamala Hills, Bhopal - 462002.
4. PS to Chairperson
5. The Secretary, Education (looking after Teacher Education) Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai.
Summary: Shri Shivaji SP Mahavidyalaya, Hingoli Maharashtra website, mobile, contact address and approval / recognition details.